Gistly
Subscribe to newsletter
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Quality assurance in a call center has always been about one question: are your agents delivering the experience you promised your clients? The challenge is that most QA programs can only answer that question for 2-5% of conversations.
That gap between what's monitored and what actually happens on the phones is where compliance violations go undetected, coaching opportunities are missed, and client satisfaction quietly erodes. This guide covers how to build a call center quality assurance program that eliminates that gap, moving from sample-based monitoring to systematic, data-driven quality management.
Call center quality assurance (QA) is the systematic process of evaluating agent-customer interactions against defined performance and compliance standards. It encompasses monitoring calls, scoring performance, identifying training needs, and ensuring regulatory compliance across every conversation your team handles.
A complete QA program serves three core functions:
The distinction between QA as a concept and QA as it's actually practiced in most call centers is significant. The concept implies comprehensive oversight. The reality in most operations is a QA analyst listening to 5-10 calls per agent per month and filling out a spreadsheet. That's not quality assurance. It's quality sampling.
Three forces are making call center QA a board-level priority.
BPO clients increasingly demand evidence-based quality reporting. Contracts now include quality KPIs tied to penalties and renewals, which means QA scores need to be statistically meaningful, not anecdotal.
In India, the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act creates specific obligations for organizations processing personal data through voice channels. Call centers handling financial services, healthcare, or collections calls face disclosure requirements on every interaction, not just the ones that happen to be reviewed. Globally, regulations like GDPR, TCPA, and PCI-DSS impose similar demands.
The compliance case for comprehensive QA is straightforward: you can't prove compliance on calls you didn't review.
Indian BPOs experience 60-80% annual agent attrition. That means a 300-agent operation is effectively rebuilding half its workforce every year. Without systematic QA, each new cohort repeats the same mistakes, and the operation never compounds its training investment.
Most call centers still run QA with a familiar workflow:
This model has three structural problems.
Sample size is statistically meaningless. A 300-agent center handling 500 calls per agent per month generates 150,000 conversations. Reviewing 1,500-3,000 of those (1-2%) doesn't tell you how the operation is actually performing. It tells you how the sampled calls performed.
QA analysts are expensive and bottlenecked. Each analyst can evaluate 8-12 calls per day. To review even 5% of calls at a 300-agent center, you'd need 25+ full-time QA analysts. Most operations staff 3-5 and accept the coverage gap.
Feedback loops are too slow. By the time a QA finding reaches an agent, days or weeks after the call, the context is gone. The coaching moment has passed.
An effective call center quality assurance program rests on four pillars.
Before evaluating anything, codify your quality standards into a structured QA scorecard. A scorecard converts subjective quality judgments into measurable, weighted criteria.
The 4Cs framework provides a proven starting structure:
Weight the categories to reflect your priorities. A collections call center will weight compliance at 40%+. A sales operation will weight competence and customer focus higher.
The most common complaint about QA programs is inconsistency. Calibration sessions, where multiple evaluators score the same call independently and then compare results, are essential for credibility. Target inter-rater reliability above 85%.
Modern conversation intelligence platforms can evaluate every call against your scorecard criteria automatically. Instead of QA analysts listening to recordings, AI processes 100% of conversations, scoring, flagging, and categorizing them in real time or post-call.
The shift from sampling to 100% automated auditing doesn't eliminate QA analysts. It redirects them. Instead of spending 80% of their time listening to calls, they spend it on:
QA data is only valuable if it reaches the people who can act on it. Build structured feedback workflows:
Track these seven metrics to measure QA program effectiveness:
AI is reshaping call center QA at every stage of the workflow.
Speech analytics converts every call into searchable, analyzable text. Modern ASR engines handle multiple languages, accents, and the code-switching patterns common in Indian contact centers.
Multilingual transcription is particularly critical for BPOs operating across India's linguistic landscape. A QA program that only works for English-language calls is blind to 40-60% of interactions in many operations.
AI applies your scorecard criteria to every transcribed call. Compliance checks, greeting verification, closing procedures, keyword detection, and sentiment analysis are all evaluated automatically. Calls that score below threshold are flagged for human review.
This inverts the traditional QA model. Instead of humans finding problems in a sample, AI finds problems in every call, and humans verify, coach, and improve.
When you're analyzing 100% of calls, patterns emerge that no sampling-based program would catch: a sudden spike in customer complaints about a billing change, a compliance disclosure that agents consistently skip on Friday afternoons, or a correlation between call duration and QA score that reveals a script efficiency issue.
The next evolution is AI that doesn't just evaluate calls after they happen, but guides agents during live conversations. This includes prompting compliance disclosures, suggesting responses to objections, and surfacing relevant knowledge base articles as the conversation unfolds.
India's BPO industry operates at a scale and complexity that generic QA guidance doesn't address.
A single BPO may handle calls in 8-10 languages across different clients and campaigns. Your QA framework needs to evaluate quality consistently across languages, which means transcription that handles Indic languages and code-switching natively, not as a bolt-on feature.
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act creates audit requirements that manual QA simply cannot satisfy. Automated QA creates the audit trail the DPDP Act demands: every call transcribed, every compliance checkpoint evaluated, every violation flagged and timestamped. This is especially critical for BPOs handling collections, insurance, and financial services calls where sensitive PII flows through every conversation.
With 60-80% annual turnover, Indian BPOs are perpetually onboarding. QA data should directly inform the training pipeline. Without comprehensive QA data, you're answering questions about agent performance with intuition. With 100% call auditing, you're answering them with evidence.
BPO clients are increasingly sophisticated about quality measurement. They expect QA reports grounded in comprehensive data, not extrapolated from small samples. A QA program that covers 100% of calls gives you a defensible, data-backed quality narrative for every client review.
A QA program that generates scores but doesn't change behavior isn't a quality program. It's an audit exercise. Every QA evaluation should connect to a coaching action.
A 50-criteria scorecard evaluated on a 10-point scale creates the illusion of precision. Start with 10-15 criteria across 4-5 categories. Add complexity only when the base framework is calibrated and consistently applied.
QA programs that agents perceive as punitive destroy morale and increase attrition. Involve agents in scorecard design. Make scoring transparent. Use QA data for coaching and recognition, not just discipline.
QA is a system that connects monitoring, evaluation, coaching, training, and operational decision-making. When QA exists in a silo, producing reports nobody reads and scores nobody acts on, it consumes resources without producing outcomes.
If you're building a QA program from scratch or upgrading from manual sampling, follow these six steps:
Call center quality assurance is the systematic process of monitoring, evaluating, and improving agent-customer interactions against defined standards. It includes call monitoring, performance scoring, compliance verification, coaching, and continuous improvement.
Quality monitoring is the act of observing and recording agent interactions. Quality assurance is the broader system that includes monitoring plus evaluation, scoring, coaching, and continuous improvement.
With manual QA, the industry standard is 5-10 calls per agent per month, covering only 1-3% of interactions. With AI-powered QA, you can evaluate 100% of calls, making sampling-based targets obsolete.
Most mature programs target 80-90% average QA scores. New programs often start at 65-75% and improve as coaching takes effect. More important than the absolute number is the trend.
Your QA framework needs transcription that accurately handles all languages your agents use (including code-switching), and scorecard criteria that can be applied consistently regardless of language. AI-powered platforms with native multilingual support solve the first challenge.
The DPDP Act requires organizations to demonstrate compliant handling of personal data on every interaction, not just sampled ones. QA programs need to verify consent capture, PII handling, and purpose limitation across 100% of calls. Automated compliance monitoring addresses this requirement.
QA ROI shows up in four areas: reduced compliance risk, improved client retention, lower training costs, and reduced attrition. Contact centers that deploy AI-powered QA typically reduce manual review time by 60-80%.
Gistly is a conversation intelligence platform that analyzes 100% of your calls with multilingual transcription, automated QA scoring, and compliance monitoring, delivering actionable insights within 48 hours. Request a free demo
Gistly audits every conversation automatically — compliance flags, QA scores, and coaching insights in 48 hours.